Qualcomm announced its Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 processor last week. The key improvement is the enhanced AI that will work behind the scenes to improve the user experience on the phone due to launch in a few weeks.

This AI implementation should significantly improve most tasks, from how well the modem works to optimizing both voice and data connections for image capture, viewing, and improving overall power efficiency.

In short, the next generation of Snapdragon 8 premium smartphones should outperform any previous generation and any phone that doesn’t use Qualcomm technology (like, say, oh, iPhones).

Let’s talk about how AI will exponentially improve your smartphone experience, then close with my product of the week, an AMD-based business notebook from HP that’s the new norm in size and capacity for performance-oriented mobile workers. Could

Qualcomm’s coming AI disruption

2020 is likely to be known as the decade of AI. The vast majority of where artificial intelligence is used today is in externally-focused applications for sales and marketing. The AI ​​we deal with most, such as those from Google and Apple, are not really AI at present, but speech front-ends for existing Internet search engines.

This is the reason why the promised experiences of Siri-like interactions on our phones have fallen short of expectations. But just as AI is evolving in the rest of the tech industry, so are the AI ​​capabilities in our smartphones, and Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 solution is a significant AI boost.

This AI improvement will initially benefit performance and battery life, both of which received criticism in the first generation of the Snapdragon 8.

For graphics performance, AI can be used to allow for real-time upsampling, resulting in better images for things like video and games, with less processing overhead, up to 25% faster GPU performance, 4.35 Up to times faster AI performance (depending on use case), and more efficient power usage for better battery life.

Now moving on to the feature improvements which are also important.

network, camera, sound

Networking improvements include Wi-Fi 7, the latest Wi-Fi technology, which should offer much faster data rates and potentially greater range. However, testing will have to wait for the availability of Wi-Fi 7 routers that are expected to hit the market soon.

AI improvements to the camera include more accurate face and object recognition, including a sharp increase in processor-intensive features like background blue, which has become popular for video calls since the pandemic (since we all share our offices). don’t keep it neat enough to do).

Expect AI camera features to better provide for automatic picture editing, making the resulting image look more professional and all objects in the frame clearer. The new camera capability should include 8K HDR video encoding, which is coming in time for 8K TVs and monitors to ramp up in 2023 and hopefully cost much less than we have today.

For most of us, it’ll just be premature obsolescence protection, assuring that when we finally do get an 8K display, we’ll have something we can show on it.

Improved image segmentation enables the camera to better capture or block out elements at different depths in the picture, allowing the AI ​​to apply custom lighting and contrast to these elements to make them pop out of the image. want to see and more easily allow you to remove whatever you want from the picture, like your cousin photobombing you.

Hear significantly enhanced sound with levels of active noise cancellation that many of us have only experienced. In the demo, turning on this feature seemed to remove all external noise except for the speaker’s voice, which is important for those of us either calling or doing video conference calls in noisy environments Huh. This technology is potentially applicable to both smartphones and laptops.

futuristic mix of smartphone and laptop

Most of the features showcased with Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 processor will also be available on the laptop. With Microsoft removing the need for emulation from the Arm processor, the performance jump on laptops based on this part should be much greater than it would have been for the newer processors.

This opens the door to a new hybrid product potential that allows a single device to meet the needs of both a laptop and a smartphone with accessories for use cases, creating a unique advantage for this superior Qualcomm technology .

Longer battery life, greater performance, and the vastly improved videoconferencing capability that x86-based systems can exceed will go a long way toward turning Qualcomm-based PCs from niche products to mainstream offerings.

Furthermore, the ever-tighter integration of smartphone and laptop use cases could ultimately result in a hybrid solution that renders both existing platforms obsolete and creates something new that is potentially more capable, less expensive, and less demanding. is complex enough to support very different offerings today. ,

Conclusion: Our AI Future

AI applied to our personalized technology that promises far better pictures and sound Automatic, advanced, and more easy-to-use security features such as biometrics Better network and system performance Longer battery life and longer battery life Is.

However, this is only the beginning of the AI ​​revolution, as the changes to come will edit your video image in real time to make sure you look your best in pictures, movies and especially video calls, and make your device look like the real world. Allow problems to be solved better. — Like real-time foreign language translation.

With improvements in head-mounted displays, mixed reality technologies and the coming metaverse revolution, we are at the tip of the iceberg that new Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 solutions are anticipated. As amazing as it is, the best is yet to come.

tech product of the week

HP EliteBook 865 G9

There was a time when there was a huge difference in price and performance between Intel and AMD notebooks. Intel-based systems performed better, especially with regard to battery life in laptops, but they cost more. The AMD notebook performed nearly as well, but took a bigger battery life hit and cost less. Those days are essentially over, as shown by this latest HP EliteBook 865 G9.

It’s an AMD-based, high-performance notebook with good battery life and the first notebook with USB 4, matching Intel’s Thunderbolt technology in terms of performance. As you’d expect, a product with performance that potentially exceeds Intel’s with a larger screen and total security will be expensive, so expect a price tag of around $2,000 when fully configured. The admission price is closer to $1,500, depending on the specials available at the time of purchase.

HP EliteBook 865 G9 Notebook PC

HP EliteBook 865 G9 Notebook PC | Image credit: HP

The 16-inch display works well in a coach seat on a plane for movies and is probably the largest display you can reasonably use while in coach, though not comfortably unless you have Don’t have an extended legroom seat. Otherwise the keyboard is too close.

The HP EliteBook 865 G9 also comes with LTE-A Pro if you want WAN network capability on top of its Wi-Fi 6E capability. It’s got integrated AMD Radeon graphics, so it’s no gaming box, but it plays the games I play mostly just fine, and streamed or downloaded movies and TV shows are amazing, which I used it the most while traveling on an aeroplane. ,

Battery life for video playback is an impressive 20-plus hours, with the only downside being the display, which is an adequate IPS panel but would have been better with a 4K OLED option that wasn’t available this round.

Finally, with HP’s pioneering Wolf security package, which is critically important in this less-secure digital world, the HP EliteBook 865 G9 is the perfect offering for the road warrior who also wants a decent-sized screen — and This is my product of the week.

MediaTek’s brand is often associated with affordable, budget, Android phones. However, the company has made incremental inroads into more premium, high-performance models. The launch of the MediaTek Dimensity 9200 chipset is a powerful step in that direction.

Like all smartphone chips, the Dimensity 9200 is a system on a chip (SoC), meaning it has integrated functionality in a single solution for wireless and cellular connectivity, graphics and system performance, among other capabilities.

Similar to Apple silicon or Qualcomm’s Snapdragon offerings, this integrated approach facilitates the smaller form factor designs that have always been important in mobile devices, longer battery life and increased power efficiency without compromising speed.

MediaTek is promoting this mobile chip to be the first in the industry to use the Armv9 Gen 2 architecture, which requires new cores. A so-called “big” Cortex-X3 core handles the toughest tasks with the help of three Cortex-A715 performance cores.

In addition, the 9200 includes four Cortex-A510 “low-power” cores to optimize battery life. This combination facilitates performance improvements of up to 10% to 12% compared to the legacy Dimension 9000, but is believed to reduce power consumption by a meaningful 25%.

I spoke with MediaTek GM/Corporate Marketing Finbar Moynihan about the Dimensity 9200 at its launch last week. The following video clip highlights that conversation.

better graphics performance

The attractive element of the Dimensity 9200 is the improvement in graphics performance. The solution is one of the first chips in the industry to take advantage of Arm’s new Immortalis-G715 GPU, which provides hardware raytability, one of the most popular gaming technologies in the PC and laptop arena. According to MediaTek, the Dimensity 9200’s implementation is 32% faster than the Dimensity 9200’s CPU while using a remarkable 41% less power.

Given MediaTek’s legacy strengths in Wi-Fi and cellular connectivity, it’s not surprising that the Dimensity 9200 shows improvements in those areas. Unlike previous generations of its mobile chips, the Dimensity 9200 includes both millimeter wave 5G and sub-6GHz connectivity, which will benefit consumers who look for faster cellular data in more parts of the world.

The Dimensity 9200 also offers Wi-Fi 7 support. With Wi-Fi 6 and 6e still trending in routers, smart home devices, and smartphones, MediaTek should be commended for future-proofing the Dimensity 9200 with Wi-Fi 7 capability as it delivers potentially game-changing latency and performance. Provides wireless speed advantages.

Another interesting feature of the Dimensity 9200 is that the chip’s Image 890 signal processor is the first to fully support RGBW camera sensors. These sensors not only provide more brightness and detail in images than native RGB, but they can also blur background images in real-time video. A demo showing this capability was one of the highlights of the announcement event.

analyst comments

During its recent analyst event in Sonoma, California, where it launched the Dimensity 9200 among other announcements, the company took great pains to underline that MediaTek is “more than mobile”. This claim isn’t surprising, as the smartphone market has slowed down dramatically over the past few years. After all, the company has a strong presence in the router, smart TV, IoT, and other device categories.

MediaTek isn’t usually a company to talk about in the US smartphone market, given that Apple and Qualcomm dominate the space with their respective silicon and Snapdragon solutions. But this may change soon as MediaTek is increasing its presence in mid and low-end handsets.

Furthermore, if the US economy slips into a recession in 2023, as many economists predict, the high-end segment of the market is likely to come under tremendous pressure. MediaTek’s strategy to push bleeding-edge technology into the more affordable mid-range segment of the market could pay big dividends as consumers find it challenging to pay $1,500 or more for the highest-end Apple iPhone or Samsung Galaxy. looks like.

Leader in Smartphone Chip Shipments

There are definite signs that this strategy is working. MediaTek has been the No. 1 global smartphone chip shipment provider for the past two years. Industry reports indicate that MediaTek accounts for 37% of global smartphone chips, compared to Qualcomm’s 28%.

Of course, MediaTek’s chips don’t appear in the sexier mobile devices people are used to. Nevertheless, they offer the right mix of performance, innovation, and affordability that increasingly appeals to “mainstream” consumers.

To be clear, MediaTek doesn’t want to walk away from the mobile phone space – and shouldn’t. The “More than mobile” moniker is an effective marketing slogan because it correctly suggests that the company is into more products than casual users beyond smartphones. However, it also allows the company to remind people that it is focusing on future markets, such as VR, automotive, Wi-Fi 7 and 5G.

Apple and Qualcomm get much of the media attention when they release a new chip, but with its Dimensity 9200, MediaTek shows it can play with the big boys. Even if it doesn’t grab all the industry headlines, MediaTek appears to be successful – and the company’s leadership team likes it.

We are approaching a major technological pivot, where the processing we do personally is not on our local PCs but in the connected cloud.

At the forefront of this charge is Qualcomm, which uses Arm technology to round out its PC solution. Microsoft has followed Apple to Arm, but unlike Apple, it partnered with Qualcomm to get there. To chase this opportunity, Qualcomm also bought Nuvia, which on paper has better technology than Apple.

In response to this acquisition, Arm pulled Nuvia’s license to halt progress, apparently forgetting that Qualcomm’s license already included similar efforts. Looking at history, there’s a good chance that Apple is at least partly behind this and working to prevent the creation of a better solution than its own, as well as the PC-targeted Arm by Arm. Steps have been taken ahead of time to maximize the benefits from the solutions.

Let’s explore this litigation mess, and we’ll close out with our product of the week, which is AMD’s latest Ryzen 7 processor.

Incoming PC spindle

The PC market is moving towards cloud services and connectivity for battery life with a heavy focus on local performance.

In my last two trips, I’ve noticed that airplane Wi-Fi, which until now barely worked for web browsing and email, now works for streaming. It’s still not fast enough to stream games, but the jump in performance is notable. This was an area that lags far behind home use, and remote 5G performance in particular, seems to have stalled this pivot.

This limiting factor will disappear as we move to 6G in the second half of the decade, making connectivity and battery life more compelling. Assuming that Qualcomm and Microsoft’s efforts continue to be successful, it would prefer that solution over others.

Intel has begun shifting its roadmap to the occasion, and it looks like it will be ready to pivot. Intel’s solution, which promises a hybrid approach with the performance you need when you need it and the battery life and connectivity you want in a bi-model solution, should provide a decent hedge of its dominant PC market share.

AMD and Nvidia’s response to this trend is less defined, especially since Nvidia’s attempt to buy the arm failed. But I hope that both companies also see this opportunity and risk and are moving to address it.

bad times

This means that if Qualcomm doesn’t execute fast, its gains could be lost due to its inability to perform and a successful pivot by existing strong vendors. What Arm should be doing is throwing all its support behind Qualcomm’s anything-but-sure gamble assuring to improve Arm-centric results rather than trying to cripple the effort before it gets to critical mass. Can go

On the economic side, while I understand the desire to get a higher license fee for a portion that has the potential to lead to higher gross margins, pivoting the market comes with higher costs. The anticipated additional gross margin will be consumed by marketing efforts and sales discounts designed to drive this arm-favored pivot.

In other words, it’s time to negotiate a new pricing deal once the effort is successful and Qualcomm has the extra income to make such growth work — not when the company enters a hostile market. and needs every financial resource.

In short, Arm acts as if Qualcomm is taking unfair advantage of Arm’s favorable pricing, which could be sustainable if Qualcomm is already successful. Even so, Qualcomm’s current license agreement will still have to be fleshed out, but at least the numbers will work in its favor.


Apple undoubtedly has a lot to say in Arm because it has licensing terms that could be more favorable than Qualcomm’s. This last one will likely be a veiled secret, but will be in line with deals I’ve seen with other Apple suppliers. Apple is known for deals that are so good that its suppliers often wonder if they would have been better off passing them on.

As I see it, Apple doesn’t really want an Arm solution, especially one blessed by Microsoft, to be better than the one it’s using. The Qualcomm solution using Nuvia’s technology looks vastly better. Apple already hides the high margins that result from using cheaper technology in its premium lines – such as avoiding touch screens that are common in competing PC products.

A significant performance loss, as well as a lack of compelling cloud performance solutions, will cost Apple too much for its less religious base, especially creators.

Moving again to cripple Qualcomm so that its better solution doesn’t hit the market would be in line with what Apple attempted in prior efforts, which included a hostile takeover backed by Broadcom and a bogus complaint with the FTC.

RISC-V Benefits

What really makes this interesting is that before this happened, there was an anti-Hands effort on the part of the RISC-V consortium. RISC-V has similar capabilities to Arm but with a more modern and licensee-friendly business model.

This model had already led many developers to move from Arm to RISC-V, so this ill-advised hostile action between Arm and one of its largest licensees gave rise to RISC-V’s superior (in terms of licensee benefits). ) has put a spotlight on the business model.

Thanks to Nvidia’s failure to acquire Arm and the resulting IPO, which funded Arm independence but did not adequately fund development, Arm’s future revenue could be at risk, which could affect its ability to finance debt. For this it will need to advance its technology.

Ultimately, Qualcomm and Microsoft should look more favorably at RISC-V over arm due to this mis-timed and poor legal action.

wrapping up

It often happens that when companies are struggling, they turn to litigation for their operational problems. This rarely works because CEOs usually don’t understand how litigation really works, and as a result, they place more faith in this approach than in history.

Arm is in trouble primarily because it depends on acquiring Nvidia for its future growth and success, and now it’s starved for revenue. But a licensing model (both Arm and Qualcomm are licensing experts) requires trust between the parties and a deep understanding of the big picture so that the end result is successful and profitable for both entities.

Qualcomm is advised to be crippled on the frontlines of a massive war against x86, given that Qualcomm’s success was never assured and that Intel, in particular, would be facing this threat to its market share. Successfully making spindle to remove.

Qualcomm needs Arm’s help to be successful. Instead, the arm is damaging the effort to a degree that it may fail. The obvious move for both Qualcomm and its Microsoft partner is to move to RISC-V, putting the entire issue in the rearview mirror.

Such a move would either kill Arm or, more likely, effectively turn it into a poorly funded Apple subsidiary. This end would make Apple less competitive over time as well.

I think we are starting to see the end of Arm, and while Arm can blame others, it will only blame itself.

Technical Product of the Week

AMD Ryzen 7000

For most of its life, AMD has been under Intel. This is how the PC market was conceived: Intel required another x86 vendor to meet IBM’s requirement that the part not be sole-source.

Relations between Intel and AMD were anything but friendly as AMD did not like to be subordinate to Intel and wanted a greater market share than Intel. To be fair, Intel was still doing most of the heavy lifting in terms of market creation and maintenance, so it took advantage.

Over the past decade, Intel tried to treat x86 as a cash cow and cut back on development and ecosystem maintenance significantly, allowing AMD to catch up first in terms of performance and then a significant gap on servers, workstations and PCs. allowed to bypass Intel.

Intel maintained the lead in terms of installed base, compliance, and overall resources, but AMD took the performance crown. Intel is attempting to catch up and, as noted above, is aggressively pivoting to address the battery life and connectivity threat that Qualcomm represents.

But when it comes to PCs, AMD’s Ryzen 7000 owns the performance crown at the moment. Be aware though, that performance is relative, and Intel’s 13th generation parts look more competitive.

AMD Ryzen 7000 Series Processors image credit: amd

I’ve assembled my first Ryzen 7000 desktop system, and one huge advantage is that, as Intel did a few years ago, AMD has gotten rid of the pins on the chip, which pretty much eliminates where Many of us broke ours (breaking a pin on the assembly was almost a given). Plus, you no longer need to replace the backing plate when adding a heavy air or water cooler.

All of this makes building a system faster and easier than ever before. So, more power, easier assembly, and a great result make the new Ryzen 7000 processor line my product of the week.

The opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of ECT News Network.

Germany-based Tuxedo Computers has released its specific operating system as a stand-alone distribution that provides a reasonably productive choice among a bloated supply of Linux variants.

Previously, you could only get Tuxedo OS pre-installed on company computers. Now anyone can try it out as a separate distro, making good on its mission statement of making Linux accessible to the general public. At first blush, Tuxedo OS is identical to a default install of Kubuntu (Ubuntu’s classic iteration of the KDE distro), just with custom startup and shutdown screens and wallpapers.

Buying a dedicated Linux computer instead of reusing new or old Windows or Mac hardware is often hindered by a lack of manufacturers. Perhaps one of the more well-known and accessible outlets is US-based System76, which has launched its own in-house Linux version, POP! _OS as a separate Linux distribution.

Tuxedo Computers based its OS on Ubuntu 22.04 LTS and fine-tuned the KDE Plasma desktop to accommodate its own hardware. System 76 tweaked GNOME Desktop. Both versions run on most computer configurations without hardware requirements or the need for a dedicated set of additional software.

Standard 1.0. No

Don’t let the Tuxedo OS version 1.0 label deter you from trying out this latest Linux offering. The actual coding has been around as long as the pre-installed OS on the company’s hardware lineup. Therefore, its public release is far more polished than its version 1.0 moniker.

The KDE Plasma Desktop is not a full clone of what you can download in other iterations. The in-house developers took six months to develop, test, document and design the stand-alone offering.

Tuxedo OS left-side panel

Tuxedo OS The left side panel shows windows open with Alt+Tab.

The Tuxedo version of this desktop environment includes Tuxedo Control Center, Tuxedo Tomte Driver Configuration Service, and a few other changes.

These include an accent color and wallpaper set, a natively packaged Firefox and Nvidia drivers. Flatpak comes pre-installed instead of Snap, though it’s disabled by default unless you flip the switch for this alternative software distribution package.

troublesome loading routine

My biggest disappointment with Tuxedo OS is the cluttered approach to setting it up. Especially for newcomers to Linux, developers made running live sessions — whether from DVD or USB thumb drives — anything but convenient.

So much so that I almost gave up on installing it out of frustration. Once installed, the operating system is a relatively pleasant experience, provided you prefer the KDE desktop. Loading it up to try it out before even clicking the Install button is a painfully slow process of trial and error.

The problem is not with running an OS originally made for factory installation on dedicated hardware. Developers need to design a more “fail-proof” installation engine if they expect users to adopt Tuxedo OS.

My horror story started with a sophisticated GUI-driven interface. Typically, with most Linux installations the process boots the computer with the ISO files into an easy-to-follow menu where you click on an option and go to the next set of options. But this menu was confusing and often didn’t work without heavy troubleshooting.

For example, the first screen shows options like “Boot from USB/HDD” and “Boot from DVD/VM”, followed by options like “WebFAI Notebook” and “WebFAI Desktop Installation”. Then there was a separate list for “UEFI Firmware Settings”.

Tuxedo OS Live Session Boot

Any readme file options or other sources of information about the meaning of the options were lacking. The menu and website were of no such help.

too many guesses

The first option is ambiguous and suggests starting the computer from a hard drive or removable media. How was this different from the other option specifying HDD or VM?

When I selected the top option, the result was only a terminal screen displaying command prompt. The second entry started the live session of the temporary virtual machine through the ISO installation medium.

But it only works on computers configured with an agreed BIOS setting. Since I tried the installation on four different computers, some had BIOS settings, and some had UEFI settings already disabling Secure Boot on Windows machines.

On some of my machines, the installation started and wandered along the way, and on others, it never started. That encounter prompted me to play with the menu’s fifth option, which involved changing the BIOS and UEFI settings.

I later learned that Integrated WebFAI (short for Fully Automated Installation), a custom Linux deployment tool, requires a special USB key, which the company provides, or you can create one yourself, assuming So that you know the directions. It also requires a wired network connection to complete this type of installation.

long wait plan

Each attempt to install this distro resulted in the painful omission of blank screen before the first menu screen was displayed at the end. Seriously, I mean up to 15 minutes. Sometimes the blinking indicator light on the optical drive would go off, so I had to wait for the blinking to resume before I turned the box off and tried again.

Once I got the right combination of options on one of my four test bench computers, the DVD installation was completely complete. The time factor to do this was much longer than what I typically experience in most other Linux installations.

Once the actual installation process has gone beyond the initial menu selection, response times vary from step to step. The starting language is the default German, and I had to figure out that I needed to click a blank entry field at the bottom of the screen to activate the languages ​​list.

On some of my test gear, the window never opens; On another rig, creating a language selection or time zone with a location lock locks the computer.

On a computer that actually went through these steps, a progress bar increased to 40% and seemingly froze. Then, after a gap of 10 or more minutes, the desktop started showing up on the screen so I could start trying out Tuxedo OS.

I didn’t test Tuxedo OS after the live session. So whatever glitches were waiting for the hard drive installation to complete, I’ll never know.

Why try Tuxedo OS?

This public release without pre-installation on Tuxedo computers will once more invite developers to pull out the installation ISO. The tweaked combination of Ubuntu 22.04 Roots and the revamped KDE desktop brings some useful features to the package.

It comes with LibreOffice and a small selection of games pre-installed. It also includes a Tuxedo Tools group with two custom applications installed and the Tuxedo Control Center system-monitoring app. Tuxedo WebFAI Creator runs as a panel applet by default, although you can easily turn it off.

The developers bundled the OS Probe feature by default. Before Grub 2.06, it was easy to install Ubuntu as a dual boot next to other operating systems. Prober detected the other OS and gave users a boot menu to choose which OS to use for each session.

The same ISO handles encrypted and unencrypted options when installed on a hard drive. A corresponding prompt appears before the installation begins.

The stand-alone version of Tuxedo OS lets you choose the file system of your choice. So, you can configure btrfs or XFS in addition to the standard ext4.

ground level

No doubt, I’ll circle back when the developer releases the upgrade. Neither KDE nor GNOME is a compelling reason for me to swap out my favorite daily driver yet.

But Tuxedo’s approach has piqued my interest and it has the potential to take a mainstream platform position. I use a number of KDE applications on my main productivity computer, and now the “newer” distro has a lot in its suite of apps bundled in. You can find Tuxedo OS on the Tuxedo Computers website.

suggest a review

Is there a Linux software application or distro that you would like to recommend for review? Something you love or want to know?

Email me your thoughts and I’ll consider them for future columns.

And use the Reader Comments feature below to provide your input!

With the San Francisco 49ers being trounced by the Kansas City Chiefs on Sunday, it’s fair to say that Infineon Technologies had a much better week than the Niners. Eventually, Infineon used Levi’s Stadium, home of the 49ers, to host their annual OktoberTech event.

OktoberTech is organized in many cities around the world. Infineon uses the event to showcase its wide portfolio of component semiconductor solutions that often appear in automobiles, industrial power control products, power and sensor systems, and secure connected offerings.

Given Levi’s Stadium’s reputation as one of the most energy-efficient and sustainable arenas in the National Football League, Infineon has extended its decarbonization and digitization themes pervading their product offerings, especially to host Oktobertech. Place chosen for promotion.

Infineon is not light in terms of technology. As of September 2021, the company employed over 50,000 employees globally and recorded revenues of EUR 11.06 billion, or approximately US$10.9 billion.

Objectives of OktoberTech

As articulated by Infineon’s North America President Bob Lefort, OktoberTech is an engaging medium that showcases its solution catalog in a friendly and casual environment and encourages enthusiastic discourse with event attendees and company partners. does.

The OktoberTech moniker pays tribute to the company’s German heritage. Headquartered in Neubiberg, Germany, Infineon was spun off from its former parent company, Siemens AG, in 1999.

Several executive presentations given at the event highlighted the company’s efforts to fight global warming. Thematically, 30 product demos tied directly or indirectly to reducing the impact of carbon emissions and optimizing electrical energy use.

Infineon’s mission is fueled by its legacy of success in several high-profile market categories. The company reports about 20% in the industrial electronics space, 15% in microcontrollers, 44% in sensor technology, and 25% in security-based products.

Infineon Automotive Solutions

Many of the demos showcased at the OktoberTech event included automotive capabilities. For example, Infineon’s Microelectromechanical System (MEMS) microphone technology was shown at the event in collaboration with AI specialist Cerence.

Demo held at Infineon’s OktoberTech event at Levi’s Stadium on October 20, 2022

Essentially the same Infineon microphones that automakers currently use for voice recognition, these microphones are ideal for outdoor applications, such as detecting dangerous road conditions or siren warnings.

The unique engineering challenge with identifying sirens is that police and emergency vehicles use over 1,500 different sirens around the world. However, Cerence’s AI technology can accurately detect a siren, then automatically stop the car, and pull it over to allow emergency vehicles to pass.

Infineon’s MEMS microphone technology is also “hardened” for use outside the car because it is qualified to the AEC-Q103-003 standard, which means it can work in low (-40 degrees F) and high (221 degrees F) temperatures. can work. These microphones also have a form of noise cancellation for capturing distortion-free audio that is needed for loud environments.

Analyst Tech

The extensive library of content capabilities available in the market by Infineon is hard to digest. Many of the end-user products that consumers and businesses use every day and are taken for granted, would not be possible without Infineon’s innovation, design-in prowess, and perhaps most important, cost-effectiveness.

From an external marketing standpoint, Infineon’s main challenge is that most consumers are unfamiliar with the company, as its technology is often not clear to the end user. Other ingredient companies are also not immune to this problem, but I think Infineon will benefit from awareness work and messaging.

However, without this the final product itself would not be possible. In product categories such as automobiles, silicon technology that comprises the overall bill of materials is growing rapidly as cars become more digital, EV-oriented and technology-based.

Even in today’s non-EV vehicles, there are estimated to be around 1,000 chips embedded, and in EVs that number rises to 2,000, underscoring Infineon’s strategic business opportunity.

closing thoughts

Undoubtedly, there are several market tailwinds in the back of Infineon. With automobiles increasingly becoming “computers on wheels” – a phrase used in many interviews with Infineon executives during the OktoberTech event – Infineon’s know-how in this area is a tremendous asset to continued growth.

But supporting decarbonization and adopting digitization more aggressively at the macro-market level could fuel the company’s growth over the next several years.

Another point needs to be made: more progress must be made to dramatically reduce bureaucracy in the local permitting and regulatory areas related to EV chargers. As I reported a few weeks ago, companies like Infineon are able to delve into the EV charger space if it takes several weeks to meet local permitting regulations, which quickly lose their appeal with consumers and businesses.

Infineon’s position in IoT solutions, always one of its forte, should remain solid, with the Matter Inoperability initiative, expected to grow at the hyper-level of the consumer market. eventually It is set to appear in tangible products in early 2023.

Finally, Infineon’s 2016 acquisition of Cyprus Semiconductor has the potential to set the company apart from its competitors. The addition of Cypress allows Infineon to focus on the company’s core growth and a much broader range of applications.

In an extended interview with Infineon’s senior executive team, it appears that its leadership understands its business opportunity and corporate responsibility to maximize decarbonization with its solutions.

Interview with Infineon’s leadership at the OktoberTech event at Levi’s Stadium on October 20, 2022

Bob Lefort quoted from the film “Spider-Man” as saying that Infineon believes that “with great power comes great responsibility.”

Not many profit-driven companies will apply that adage during an important corporate event, and it’s refreshing to see that type of clarity and reality uttered by a senior executive in the technology sector.

The sentencing of former Uber chief security officer Joseph Sullivan could lead to a quiet re-evaluation of how the chief information security officer (CISO) and the security community handle network breaches going forward.

A San Francisco federal jury indicted Sullivan on October 5 for failing to tell US officials about the 2016 hack of Uber’s database. Judge William H. Orrick did not set a date for sentencing.

Sullivan’s lawyer, David Angeli, said after the verdict was announced that his client’s sole focus was to ensure the security of people’s personal digital data.

Federal prosecutors noted that the case should serve as a warning to companies about how to comply with federal regulations when handling their network breaches.

Officials accused Sullivan of working to hide the data breach from US regulators and the Federal Trade Commission, and attempting to link his actions to prevent hackers from being caught.

At the time, the FTC was already investigating Uber after the 2014 hack. Two years later, hackers in Uber’s network repeatedly emailed Sullivan about the theft of large amounts of data. According to the US Justice Department, they promised they would delete the data if Uber paid the ransom.

The conviction is a significant precedent that has already sent shock waves through the CISO community. This dynamic policy highlights the personal liability involved in being a CISO in a legal and attacking environment, noted Casey Ellis, founder and CTO of Bugcrowd, a crowded cybersecurity platform.

“This calls for clear policy at the federal level around privacy protection and treatment of user data in the United States, and it emphasizes the fact that here a proactive approach to handling vulnerability information rather than a reactive approach is an important The component is flexibility for organizations, their security teams and their shareholders,” he told TechNewsWorld.

problem description

There is a growing tendency for companies afflicted with ransomware to interact with hackers. But the trial discourse showed prosecutors reminding the companies to “do the right thing,” according to media accounts.

According to published test accounts, Sullivan’s employees confirmed widespread data theft. This included theft records and 600,000 driver’s license numbers of 57 million Uber users.

The DOJ reported that Sullivan sought the hackers’ agreement to pay out US$100,000 in bitcoin. That agreement included the hackers signing a non-disclosure agreement to keep the hack from public knowledge. Uber reportedly hid the true nature of the payment as a bug bounty.

Only the jury had access to the evidence in the case, so it’s counterproductive to testify to specific details of the case, said Rick Holland, chief information security officer and vice president of strategy at Digital Shadows, a provider of digital risk management solutions.

“There are some general conclusions to draw. I am concerned by the unintended consequences of this case,” Holland told TechNewsWorld. “CISO already has a daunting task, and the outcome of the case has made CISO a scapegoat. Have given.”

important unanswered questions

Holland’s concerns include how the results of this trial could affect the number of leaders willing to take on the potential personal liability of the CISO role. He is also concerned about dismissing more whistleblower cases such as the escalating cases from Twitter.

He expects more CISOs to negotiate the insurance of directors and officers into their employment contracts. That type of policy provides personal liability coverage for decisions and actions a CISO may take, he explained.

“Furthermore, given the way both the CEO and CFO became responsible for corruption on the heels of the Sarbanes Oxley and Enron scandals, the CISO should not be the only culpable role in the case of wrongdoing around intrusions and breaches,” He suggested.

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 is a federal law that established comprehensive auditing and financial regulations for public companies. The Enron scandal, a series of events involving questionable accounting practices, resulted in the bankruptcy of energy, goods and services company Enron Corporation and the dissolution of accounting firm Arthur Andersen.

“CISOs should effectively communicate risks to the company’s leadership team, but should not be solely responsible for cybersecurity risks,” he said.

twisted conditions

Sullivan’s conviction is a kind of ironic role reversal. Earlier in his legal career, he prosecuted cybercrime cases for the United States Attorney’s Office in San Francisco.

The DOJ’s case against Sullivan hinged on obstructing justice and acting to conceal a felony from officers. The resulting conviction can have a long-term impact on how organizations and individual authorities approach cyber incident response, particularly where it involves extortion.

Prosecutors argued that Sullivan actively concealed the massive data breach. The jury unanimously agreed with the allegation beyond a reasonable doubt.

Instead of reporting the breach, the jury found that Sullivan, backed by the knowledge and approval of Uber’s then CEO, paid the hackers and signed a non-disclosure agreement with them, falsely claiming that he had stolen data from Uber. did not do.

A new chief executive who later joined the company reported the incident to the FTC. Current and former Uber executives, lawyers and others testified for the government.

Edward McAndrew, an attorney for Bakerhostetler and former DoJ cybercrime prosecutor and national security cyber expert, told TechNewsWorld that “Sullivan’s prosecution and now conviction is unprecedented, but it needs to be understood in its proper factual and legal context.”

He said that the government has recently adopted a very aggressive policy towards cyber security. This affects white-collar compliance, where organizations and officials are increasingly cast in the simultaneous and separate roles of crime victim and enforcement target.

“Organizations need to understand how the actions of individual employees can expose them and others to the criminal justice process. And information security professionals need to understand the actions they take in response to criminal cyberattacks. How to avoid becoming personally liable for that,” warned McAndrew.

Is your favorite Linux desktop Cinnamon, MATE or Xfce? Or are you longing for something different and potentially better?

Then one of your best options is the upgrade to Linux Mint 21 “Vanessa” released on July 30th. It comes in a choice of Ubuntu- or Debian-base flavors.

It is an important step for me to make this recommendation. Once my daily Linux driver, I had a major fallout with this distribution several years ago, when an upgrade caused some troubling issues, leading to unpleasant reactions to — and no solution at all — Linux Mint tech support. from the community.

I then jumped into Linux Mint, a near-clone of Phaeron OS, and was a happy user until the distro’s developers made a radical design change and moved away from the traditional Cinnamon desktop.

So I jumped to distros again. I had reviewed the then new Cinnamon Remix distro released by an independent Linux developer. My go-to Linux distro became Ubuntu Cinnamon Remix, later renamed Cinabuntu. I’ve been very happy with its performance and usability options since then.

The ability to pick and choose operating system and configuration options is one of the shining beads you can polish your way to with Linux. It is not possible with Windows or macOS to be able to quickly install a replacement OS with the same look and feel.

However, with the release of Linux Mint 21 my Linux reviewer got the best of me. I was curious what I was missing.

I have detected some features that are not available in my current Cinnamon version. Those new features are in the MATE and Xfce versions as well. LM 21 versions include the latest versions of the three supported desktop environments: Cinnamon 5.4, Xfce 4.16, and MATE 1.26.

Read on to see what’s pulling me back to Linux Mint. Since Cinnamon is my favorite desktop, I focused on that version for this review.

hello old friend

The Vanessa release rekindled my appreciation for how tightly knit Linux Mint is as a computing platform. From the initial loading of the live session DVD to the impeccable installation, I was up and running in less than 30 minutes.

The welcome screen is becoming a standard setup routine for Linux installations. They can all take lessons on how to do this correctly using Linux Mint as an example. Even for experienced Linux users, Linux Mint’s approach is fast and convenient to perform all first-run tasks.

The left column panel of the panel provides general information, documentation, and a great index for completing the first steps. This is especially useful for new users who are unfamiliar with Linux in general – and LM in particular.

The main window area walks you through each step of updating system components and basic desktop configuration. Each section briefly describes what is included. The green themed launch button sets each part of the process in motion.

Steps include desktop color selection, choosing a traditional or modern panel layout, updating drivers and system components, setting up system settings, and software manager. The process also includes activating the built-in firewall, which is an item that many users overlook.

Linux Mint 21 Welcome Screen

The Linux Mint 21 welcome screen guides you through all the setup steps after installation, and it’s also a handy reminder that updates need to be made from time to time.

desktop difference

Design and usability features are one of the reasons I favor the Cinnamon desktop. It has one of the most detailed and organized configuration panels of any Linux distribution.

The System Settings panel keeps all the configuration options in one place. But unlike other desktop layouts with very few options, Linux Mint organizes all system controls into four general categories. In total, 40 icons hide related subcategories until you click an icon to open it.

KDE Plasma is the only other desktop with such an amount of configuration options. But that design is a series of separate settings panels that scatter controls and user options across a lot of menu locations.

While the configuration options available in the MATE and Xfce versions are less extensive, they still offer the ability to customize the look and feel to suit your computing needs.

Linux Mint does a better job than other desktops in how it handles the screen design and usability aspects. It has a wide range of quick access tools called desktops that reside on the desktop screen. Its use of applets that reside on the lower panel adds flexibility.

lm also provides a collection of extensions that provide even more usability options (similar to those available in the KDE Plasma desktop). This combination of features is a solid reason to try this distro.

Linux Mint 21 Desktop Configuration Options

The desktop configuration options available in the MATE and Xfce versions are less extensive than in Cinnamon. They still offer the ability to have the same look and feel as your computing needs.

under the hood

Linux Mint 21 is based on Ubuntu 22.04 and provides a full WIMP display like Windows, Icon, Menu, Pointer. This is a Long Term Support (LTS) release supported until 2027.

Vanessa, which continues the LM’s imagination for naming all releases with female names ending in the letter “A”, is packed with notable improvements in performance, compatibility, and stability. It ships with the Linux kernel 5.15 LTS.

Other changes include a new NTFS file system driver that simplifies interaction with Windows partitions, improvements to the default EXT4 file system, as well as improved hardware support, security patches and bug fixes.

A major Bluetooth change to the LM Blueman circuitry replaces the Blueberry app, which relies on GNOME-desktop plumbing. Like Blueberry, Blueman is desktop-agnostic and integrates well across all environments. It depends on the standard bluez stack and works universally, including from the command line.

Blueman Manager and Tray Icons have features that were not previously available in Blueberry. It handles more information for connection monitoring or troubleshooting Bluetooth issues and brings better connectivity to the headset and audio profiles.

Linux Mint 21 Cinnamon Desktop

Linux Mint 21 classic Cinnamon desktop design sports a favorites column, application category list, and a changing sublist of installed titles.

pain point solution

Welcome to Vanessa. Its lack in earlier releases was a usability issue. To address this, a new XApp (Linux Mint Exclusive Application) project called xapp-thumbnailers was developed for Linux Mint 21.

Process Monitor is a pain point solution for me. It places a special icon in the system tray when automated tasks are running in the background. Such tasks can slow down the performance of the system until it is completed. This new monitor is a silent alert that explains computer slowdowns.

Timeshift was an independent project for backing up and restoring OSes. The producer abandoned the application. LM took over the maintenance of Timeshift prior to the release of the LM 21. Timeshift is now an XApp.

One immediate benefit is the change in the way rsync mode works. It now calculates the space required for the next OS snapshot storage. If there is less than 1 GB of free space on the disk when the snapshot is executed, it quits proceeding.

Another pain point remedy is how LM21 now handles package removal. This prevents removal from the main menu (right-click, Uninstall) if the evaluation shows that other programs will be affected. This triggers an error message and stops the operation.

If no damage is found to major system components, uninstalling an application from the main menu also removes dependencies for applications that were installed automatically and are no longer needed.

Linux Mint 21 Scale and Expo Window View

Scale and Expo window views in Cinnamon are triggered by heated corners and applets on the lower panel.

ground level

The computer hardware requirements for Linux Mint 21 have not changed. You need a modern computer because LM is not as light on system resources as it used to be. That means a box with a 64-bit processor, at least 2GB of RAM, and 15GB of free space.

If you need help installing Linux Mint 21, the Linux Mint website has a comprehensive installation guide. But that shouldn’t be a possibility. Installation Engine is well polished. Most of my computers run multiple partitions, which usually forces manual intervention.

The LM 21 installer does not stumble. It simply asked where to put the OS. The installer handled all the splitting and adjustments in the background.

suggest a review

Is there a Linux software application or distro that you would like to recommend for review? Something you love or want to know?

Email me your thoughts and I’ll consider them for future columns.

And use the Reader Comments feature below to provide your input!

Scalable cloud-based solutions are widely popular among IT professionals these days. The cost, convenience and reliability of ready-to-use software as a service make this disruptive technology a favorable choice.

Still, the market needs some reassurance that backing up to the cloud is a smart and secure thing to do, as suggested by Paul Evans, CEO of UK-headquartered data management provider RedStore.

Redstor has over 40,000 customers globally, over 400 partners, and over 100 million restores a year. Last month in London, RedStore was named Hosted Cloud Vendor of the Year at the 2022 Technology Reseller Awards.

“Companies should not only say goodbye to on-premises boxes, they should celebrate because their removal reduces the risk of ransomware or the effects of fire or flooding in the data center,” Evans told TechNewsWorld.

SaaS is a software delivery model that provides great agility and cost-effectiveness for companies. This makes it a reliable choice for many business models and industries. It is also popular among businesses due to its simplicity, user accessibility, security and wide connectivity.

According to Evans, SaaS trends are disrupting the industry this year. Spiceworks Jiff Davis predicts that next year half of all workloads will be in the cloud.

Many organizations are undertaking cloud-first migration projects. Of particular interest are hard-hit businesses that are looking for infrastructure through operational excellence (OpEx) models and frameworks to avoid huge upfront investments.

“Data will become increasingly cloud-native in the coming year, especially with the continued growth of Kubernetes, Microsoft 365, Google Workspace and Salesforce,” he said.

Danger Landscape Driving Factor

Grand View Research recently reported that the global managed services market, which was valued at US$ 239.71 billion in 2021, is expected to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 13.4 percent from this year to 2030. Many Managed Service Providers (MSPs) are looking to become more service driven.

At the same time, value-added resellers are looking to become cloud service providers. Evans said other distributors are trying to figure out which way they might be the best fit.

“The backdrop of this is a threat landscape that has changed dramatically, especially after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. State-sponsored malware and cyber warfare are coming to the fore in opposition to renegade shrewd criminals,” he said. .

US President Joe Biden has called for the private sector to step in and close its “digital doors” to protect critical infrastructure. Sir Jeremy Fleming, director of the UK’s intelligence, cyber and security agency GCHQ, warned that the Russian regime is identifying institutions and organizations to bring down, making it only a matter of time before the attacks come.

“Threats are not only increasing in scale and complexity. The range of ransomware attacks makes it abundantly clear that companies of all shapes and sizes will increasingly become targets. As a result, we will see more businesses increase their IT, cyber security and compliance Enlisting MSPs to run the programs,” predicted Evans.

During our conversation, I discussed further with Evans how RedStore and other providers can strengthen digital security.

TechNewsWorld: What’s unique about Redstor technology compared to other solutions for data management and disaster recovery?

Paul Evans: Our approach focuses on the concerns of businesses regarding their risk position, resource constraints and profitability challenges while IT skills are lacking. Redstor offers what we believe is the smartest and simplest backup platform for MSP.

One factor is the ease associated with onboarding. With three clicks and a password, users are up and running and can scale easily. In addition, it requires lightweight support for multiple data connectors and is purpose-built from the ground up for MSPs that manage multiple accounts.

It’s not a monster of some Frankenstein’s hastily achieved solutions bolted together.

What makes Redstor’s platform technically smart?

Evans: Whether MSPs are protecting data on-premises or in the cloud – Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, or cloud-native Kubernetes – they can do it easily and all with one app. By being able to span the on-premises cloud and SaaS worlds from a single location, rather than moving to several different interfaces, MSPs save time and money.

Redstor is smart because we enable user-driven recovery by streaming backup data on demand, so organizations have everything they need to get straight up and running in the event of data loss.

You don’t need to mirror everything, copy everything, or recover everything before it starts working again. During an outage, InstantData technology restores critical data back in seconds, while less critical recovery continues in the background.

This platform is also smart because it offers more than just backup. You also get archive and disaster recovery with high-end search and insights – all from one app.

Redstor is influenced by AI, and our machine learning model automatically detects and isolates suspicious files in backups so that they can be removed for malware-free recovery. MSP can do data classification with tagging. In the future, we will introduce anomaly detection.

How do cloud-based SaaS data protection and recovery systems compare to other solutions?

Evans: Organizations find that they need multiple boxes onsite to quickly pull data down to get a faster experience with the cloud. But on-premises Frankenstein solutions, coupled with technology from multiple acquisitions, aren’t going to meet today’s challenges.

Paul Evans, Redstor .  CEO of
Redstore CEO Paul Evans

Also, with hardware, there can be supply-chain issues and the lack of critical components such as semiconductors. Moving your data security to the cloud eliminates both these issues and the responsibility rests entirely on the MSP.

Without cloud-based security, you lack the best means of securing data. SaaS security is constantly updated and built in. Free updates are provided on a regular release cycle to keep customers ahead of the risks. MSP ensures reliable and secure connectors for many sources and popular applications now and in the future.

Also, storing backups securely in geographically separated data centers creates an air gap between live data and backups to enhance security.

What is driving the popularity of SaaS data protection?

Evans: The most important reason was when being onsite became problematic during the pandemic. Those with hardware-connected data security faced challenges fixing and swapping out the box. Many organizations also do not want boxes onsite because they are hard to come by because of supply-chain issues. Furthermore, the devices are known to be ransomware magnets.

SaaS overcomes these issues and more. MSPs are open to data portability requests and enable tools and services designed for today’s challenges. They can also complete the services digitally and distributors appreciate the value of SaaS made to channel supplied through online marketplaces.

Most SaaS applications now stress the need for a separate backup. More people are realizing that just because you have Microsoft doesn’t mean you can’t be compromised. You may have an internal user that destroys the data, or you may not have enough retention. Backing up SaaS applications is now the fastest growing part of our business.

What should an MSP look for from a vendor besides good technical support?

Evans: Technology built for MSPs should be partner-friendly from the start and include deep sales and marketing support. It should offer attractive margins with clear, transparent pricing so that MSPs can easily sell services.

The software should rapidly enhance data security, and by the end of the first negotiation, MSPs should be able to offer a proof of concept by deploying backups and performing rapid recovery to close deals faster.

Vendors are required to provide MSPs with the ability to purchase whatever they need from a single source, whether it’s protection for a Kubernetes environment, malware detection for backup, or data classification.

The key is also an interface to eliminate the complexity of switching between different solutions and consoles. Plus, having the ability to view and manage data from a single interface saves valuable time.

A vendor’s platform should be designed for multi-tenancy and provide a high-level view of MSP’s own usage and customer consumption. It also requires that the types of data protected and where it resides. The vendor must have a history of using new advances, particularly AI, to detect and remove malware, data classification and cyberattack predictions.

How should businesses assess seller suitability?

Evans: Many vendors make a bold claim to be the best solution to the challenges in the market. MSPs should receive direct feedback from their peers and adequately field-test the solutions.

Top 20 Backup Software, Top 20 . Check the rankings for the G2 lists online backup software, and other user-supported reviews. Focus on reports based on user satisfaction and review data. For example, Redstor ranks first with the G2.

Also look for vendors that provide a clear road map of future growth that the MSP should be able to influence. Lastly, MSPs should focus on smart solutions that provide simplified security.

Canonical is emphasizing the security and usability suitability of Internet of Things (IoT) and edge devices management with its June 15 release of Ubuntu Core 22, a fully containerized Ubuntu 22.04 LTS variant optimized for IoT and edge devices Is.

In line with Canonical’s technology offering, this release brings Ubuntu’s operating system and services to the full range of embedded and IoT devices. The new release includes a fully extensible kernel to ensure timely responses. Canonical partners with silicon and hardware manufacturers to enable advanced real-time features on Ubuntu certified hardware.

“At Canonical, we aim to provide secure, reliable open-source access everywhere – from the development environment to the cloud, to the edge and across devices,” said Mark Shuttleworth, Canonical CEO. “With this release and Ubuntu’s real-time kernel, we are ready to extend the benefits of Ubuntu Core throughout the embedded world.”

One important thing about Ubuntu Core is that it is effectively Ubuntu. It is fully containerized. All applications, kernels and operating systems are strictly limited snaps.

This means it is ultra-reliable and perfect for unattended devices. It has removed all unnecessary libraries and drivers, said David Beamonte Arbushes, product manager for IoT and embedded products at Canonical.

“It uses the same kernel and libraries as Ubuntu and its flavors, and it’s something that developers love, because they can share the same development experience for every Ubuntu version,” he told LinuxInsider.

He said it has some out-of-the-box security features such as secure boot and full disk encryption to prevent firmware replacement, as well as firmware and data manipulation.

certified hardware key

Ubuntu’s certified hardware program is a key distinguishing factor in the industry’s response to Core OS. It defines a range of trusted IoT and edge devices to work with Ubuntu.

The program typically includes a commitment to continuous testing of certified hardware in Canonical’s laboratories with every security update throughout the device’s lifecycle.

Advantech, which provides embedded, industrial, IoT and automation solutions, strengthened its participation in the Ubuntu Certified Hardware program, said Eric Cao, director of Advantech Wise-Edge+.

“Canonical ensures that certified hardware undergoes an extensive testing process and provides a stable, secure and optimized Ubuntu core to reduce market and development costs for our customers,” he said.

Another usage example, Brad Kehler, COO of KMC Controls, is the security benefits that Core OS brings to the company’s range of IoT devices, which are purpose-built for mission-critical industrial environments.

“Safety is of paramount importance to our customers. We chose Ubuntu Core for its built-in advanced security features and robust over-the-air update framework. Ubuntu Core comes with a 10-year security update commitment that allows us to keep devices safe in the field for their longer life. With a proven application enablement framework, our development team can focus on building applications that solve business problems,” he said.

solving major challenges

IoT manufacturers face complex challenges to deploy devices on time and within budget. As the device fleet expands, so too does ensuring security and remote management are taxing. Ubuntu Core 22 helps manufacturers meet these challenges with an ultra-secure, resilient and low-touch OS, backed by a growing ecosystem of silicon and original design maker partners.

The first major challenge is to enable the OS for their hardware, be it custom or generic, the well-known Arbus. It’s hard work, and many organizations lack the skills to perform kernel porting tasks.

“Sometimes they have in-house expertise, but development can take a lot longer. This can affect both time and budget,” he explained.

IoT devices should be mostly unattended. They are usually deployed in places with limited or difficult access, he offered. It is therefore essential that they be extremely reliable. It is costly to send a technician to the field to recover a bricked or unstarted device, so reliability, low touch, and remote manageability are key factors in reducing OpEx.

He added that this also adds to the challenge of managing the software of the devices. A mission-critical and bullet-proof update mechanism is critical.

“Manufacturers have to decide early in their development whether they are going to use their own infrastructure or third parties to manage the software for the devices,” Arbus said.

Beyond Standard Ubuntu

The containerized feature of Core 22 extends beyond the containerized features in non-core Ubuntu OSes. In Ubuntu Desktop or Server, the kernel and operating system are .deb packages. Applications can run as .deb or snap.

“In Ubuntu Core, all applications are strictly limited snap,” Arbusue continued. “This means that there is no way to access them from applications other than using some well-defined and secure interfaces.”

Not only applications are snaps. So are the kernel and operating system. He said that it is really useful to manage the whole system software.

“Although classic Ubuntu OSes can use Snaps, it is not mandatory to use them strictly limited, so applications can have access to the full system, and the system can have access to applications.”

Strict imprisonment is mandatory in Ubuntu Core. Additionally, both the kernel and the operating system are strictly limited snaps. In addition, the classic Ubuntu versions are not optimized for size and do not include some of the features of Ubuntu Core, such as secure boot, full disk encryption, and recovery mode.

Other Essential Core 22 Features:

  • Real-time compute support via a real-time beta kernel provides high performance, ultra-low latency and workload predictability for time-sensitive industrial, telco, automotive and robotics use cases.
  • There is a dedicated IoT App Store in the dedicated App Store for each device running Ubuntu Core. It provides complete control over apps and can create, publish and distribute software on a single platform. The IoT App Store provides enterprises with a sophisticated software management solution, enabling a range of new on-premises features.
  • Transactional control for mission-critical over-the-air (OTA) updates of kernel, OS, and applications. These updates will always complete successfully or automatically revert to the previous working version so that a device cannot be “britched” by an incomplete update. Snap also provides delta updates to reduce network traffic, and digital signatures to ensure software integrity and provenance.

More information about Ubuntu Core 22 can be found at

Download images for some of the most popular platforms or browse all supported images here.

The KYY 15.6-inch Portable Monitor is a classy and functional portable monitor that works well as a permanent second monitor while traveling or for home and office use.

This portable display panel is lightweight and sturdy, making it a solid accessory for playing games. This greatly expands the field of view when using mobile phones or game consoles with smaller screens.

The large screen easily adapts to landscape or portrait orientation. Its multi-mode viewing feature offers built-in flexibility to improve work productivity as well as make leisure time fun and hassle-free.

Switching between modes depends on the performance features of the host computer. If provided, you use the computer’s display and orientation settings for Scene Mode, HDR Mode, and Three-in-One Display Mode view. The combination of Duplicate Mode/Extension Mode/Second Screen Mode makes this model quite suitable for meeting sharing scenarios.

Overall, this KYY portable monitor packs an impressive list of features at a low cost purchase. It’s currently available on Amazon in gray (pictured above) for a list price of $199.99, or in black for $219.99. At the time of this writing, Amazon has a “deal with” price for both colors at $161.49.

hands-on impressions

The brightness rating of this unit is 300 nits. By most standards, 300 nits is the mid-point for bright and clear visual acuity. Most low-end devices display at 250 nits.

Color saturation is slightly below the industry standard because this unit lacks Adobe RBG. But unless you intend to do a lot of graphic work and demand the best visual experience for gameplay and video viewing, not having Adobe RBG in the mix shouldn’t be a deal-breaker.

Despite these two factors, I was very satisfied with the 300-nit display’s sharpness and brightness. It was as good or better as my laptop and larger screen desktop monitor.

Overall, this portable monitor works with Windows, Linux, Chrome OS, and Mac Gear. It also plays well with game consoles including PS3, PS4, Xbox One and Nintendo Switch.

objective test

To evaluate portable monitors, I focus on one unit’s performance as another display. It is important to make sure that you make a suitable selection.

Portable monitors attached to computers and game consoles differ from a full desktop monitor. Portable monitors are convenient. But they may not be suitable enough to meet all your expectations.

For example, I often drag windows to another screen to expand screen real estate when working on various documents or video presentations. They come in handy when working on content creation or research.

KYY 15.6-inch Portable Monitor as a Laptop Display Extension

Simultaneous: The 14″ x 8″ viewing screen at 16:9 aspect ratio offers a fine-tuned second viewing panel next to a large-screen portable laptop.

This is an easy way to cut down on always navigating around multiple windows spread across multiple virtual workspaces, all of which share a single monitor. Keeping track of two side-by-side screens with different objects is a new habit for me.

This KYY portable display did its job well for graphics editing as well. It performed as well as the more expensive units I used with my office laptop and desktop.

My only complaint with this unit is a finicky toggle on the left vertical edge that wasn’t always responsive enough to access the panel’s menus for brightness settings.

what’s inside

The 15.6-inch unit sports a 1080p FHD IPS USB-C display. This is not a touch screen. But its performance and price offer a good collection of features.

Its slim profile of 0.3 inches is pretty standard for a portable monitor. The right vertical edge houses two USB Type-C full function ports and a mini-HDMI port. On the left vertical edge are an on/off button for settings and a toggle wheel for audio and video functions.

The first USB-C port is used for power supply. The second USB-C port is used for video transmission and power supply. Mini-HDMI port is used for video transmission but does not support power supply.

This is an important distinction. Portable monitors do not require a wall socket if the host computer or game console supports power through its Type-C USB port. But if you connect both the devices with HDMI cable, then you should use power plug for AC.

The KYY monitor comes with a USB-A to USB-C cable that can be connected to the included power plug as well as other devices. Two USB-C cables are also included.

The assortment of included cables and plugs is compatible with most laptops, smartphones, and PCs. However, not all smartphones are compatible.

You can plug a 3.5mm headphone into a port on the bottom left vertical edge of the panel. Two one-watt speakers are built into the middle of the left and right outer edges.

final thoughts

The KYY 15.6-inch Portable Monitor is an affordable solution for accessing your computing time for working, watching videos and gaming. It does not require any additional software and requires only minimal setup.

Once connected to the computer by cable, the host machine’s display settings will automatically detect the second monitor. You just select the options it provides for how you want it to work with your main display.